24th August 04
Why a National
Party?
Since the end of WWII,
politics in the UK, and indeed in the world in general, has been overshadowed
by the great battle between the opposing dictatorships of Stalin and Hitler and
the associated creeds of Communism and Racial Nationalism.
Today’s historians were too young to have been involved in WW2 and now 60 years on they are re-examining these opposing regimes more objectively than the historians who lived through that era. One question that no historian, or indeed political commentator, will yet answer is, “Why did the United Kingdom fight on the communist side?” Why fight for or against either of these terrible totalitarian regimes?
Communism
has always been a puzzle! What is
it? Is it just an economic system? Do
communists really believe that everyone in the world would grow to be exactly
like each other, holding the same opinions and having the same desires,
provided that they are living in the same accommodation, working in similar
factories, wearing the same clothes and eating the same food; that men and
women would become the same, that genius and moron would become the same and
that the races would become the same?
Does it have to be for communists that despite their belief in an absurd
unreal equality that there always emerges in communist states a leader who is
not the same as his followers; leaders such as Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot who end
in killing millions of their own people. Must communism always be totalitarian?
Again does a Racial
Nationalist state have to be totalitarian?
Does it have to have a dictator like Hitler and have as its main
purpose, war?
Communism, as a theory in
which no individual owns property and everyone works for everybody’s general
good for free, is a benign concept.
However, ‘communism’ as practised by Lenin and then Stalin and their
followers involves the belief in a crazy impossible equality. Anyone who they believed was not equal they
executed – by the million. Their idea
that people become the same by having a like environment is known in science as
Lamarckism and in general is rejected.
However, on the other hand,
the idea of Racial Nationalism seems to be well founded and is supported by
science. Defence of one’s homeland and
concern that the individuals of the nation remain healthy and happy are normal
reasonable human desires. It was the perversion by Hitler of this ideal, and
the use he made of it as an excuse to run a totalitarian warlike state, that
has for the last 60 years prevented discussion of Racial Nationalism and its
promotion.
Racial Nationalism is a concept and is not, in itself, a system of government. What is proposed for the National Party is our traditional form of government with its traditional rights and freedoms for the individual but accepting the principle of Racial Nationalism. It specifically rejects totalitarianism be it Hitlerism, Stalinism or EU/Blairism. The Nation only unites in a compulsory way to defend our land and people, otherwise we are free! The National Party should be seen as moderate and centre of the road. It will be both conservative and socialist. It will be conservative in that it will not seek to make rapid changes and will be socialist in that it recognises that all citizens are interdependent.
The fundamental rules for the proposed National Party are given in the “The 6 Principles”.
“We hold our
land in trust from our forefathers for our children and our children’s
children.”
001 Aug 04
002 Revised Dec 06
Retitled Dec07